European Pre Teen Loli In R&S Discussions, As To Challenging Casual Statements Of Fact, Who Has The Burden Of Proof?

In R&S discussions, as to challenging casual statements of fact, who has the burden of proof? - european pre teen loli

States in a recent issue, I happened to mention the popular myth that the Catholic Church have against the first European explorers (such as Columbus, Magellan), because the browser opposes the Church's teaching that the Earth must be flat. Accordingly, several respondents claimed that I "document" The fact that faith is a myth. (Yes, believe it or not - although some of them are playing me. It is not always easy to distinguish sarcasm from ignorance in an Internet forum. The participants range from pre-teens to retirees and semi-illiterate and very cultured way Of course you get all on the same page the same way is almost impossible. meditate) However, many R & S Posts retort with "You can not prove a negative. The burden of my opponent.

Where the burden of proof lies in these discussions that are assigned? I assume that everyone, in contrast to the generally accepted view of most historians, the burden of proof to show that the scientific consensus is wrong. (ForOf course, the truth of the consensus view is more widespread than just a quick search on Google. Then there is a bit like asking for an appointment for a mathematical calculation, if a person simply can with a calculator in your account.)

Conclusion: I see many inconsistencies in this forum, how to assign the burden of proof. How can I determine who should be the burden of proof distributed?